戏剧英语作文

关于戏剧英语作文3篇

无论是在学校还是在社会中，大家总少不了接触作文吧，作文是通过文字来表达一个主题意义的记叙方法。相信许多人会觉得作文很难写吧，下面是小编为大家收集的戏剧英语作文3篇，供大家参考借鉴，希望可以帮助到有需要的朋友。

戏剧英语作文 篇1

今天，我很荣幸被邀请去观摩二年级英语戏剧节的表演活动，与小朋友们一起分享他们的佳作。

这次英语戏剧节的内容比较丰富，有二（1）班的《Fashion Show》、二（3）班的《Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs》、二（5）班的《The Enormous Turnip》……看，随着《江

南STYLE》音乐的响起，二（2）班的舞蹈小达人闪亮登场了。他们踩着欢快的节奏，在舞台上尽情地挥洒他们的舞姿。接下来是时装小达人，他们穿着自己喜欢的衣服，在T台上秀他们的风采。英语戏剧节在二（5）班有趣的舞台剧中圆满地结束。

老师的辛劳，学生的努力成就了这次的英语戏剧节。英语戏剧节不但增添了学生学英语的乐趣，还提升了英语运用能力。我看着小朋友们一张张可爱的笑脸，听着他们流利的英语对话，由衷地感谢老师为孩子们所付出的爱。我相信孩子们在老师的关爱下，在学校这个大家庭里定能茁壮地成长！

戏剧英语作文 篇2

星期二英语老师跟我说，要我星期三下午和星期四在七小学英语戏剧，不用上学了，虽然我有点担心学习，但在戏剧课里还是很开心的。

第一天

我们的班大约有二十多人，教我们表演戏剧的外籍老师叫Danni。初次见面，就有很亲切的感觉，使我上课时也放松多了。Danni老师先让我们简单地介绍一下自己。轮到我了，我响亮地说了：“I’m Sandy. I’m from No.2 primany school.”然后轮到下一个同学，等全部都介绍玩了。老师开始和我们玩游戏，第一个游戏是这样玩的：老师先分了apple组，banana组和grape组，然后搬来张凳子，围成一个圆形，然后老师一念哪个单词，那个组的同学就要抢凳子，抢不到的就输了。我们玩了几个回合，我还是没有输，我太高兴了。随着时间慢慢流逝，五点也到了。于是我们先各自回家，明天再按时回来上课。

回家的时候，我一边走，一边回忆着上课的.游戏，因为我实在太兴奋了。

第二天

早上，我吃完早餐后就急急忙忙地去上戏剧课了，生怕迟到了。又像昨天一样，走上五楼，来到那个很熟悉的课室。今天老师真正开始让我们练戏剧了。全班分成四组，每组自己写剧本，要求每个人要有五个英语句子以上。我们组演的是一场银行抢劫，而我则是一名银行职员。待我们练熟自己组的剧本时，就依次表演给老师看，让老师给我们指导一下神态，动作。我们就这样努力地练呀练呀，一个上午的时间就过去了…….

下午，我们要正式在大舞台上表演了，虽然这并不是什么很好的机会，但我们还是很努力地去排练。终于到了，三点钟到了…..

来到舞台前，我们按顺序坐好。表演开始了，先是别人组开始演。看着他们的努力表现，我真有点担心我能不能发挥好。轮到我们了，我怀着紧张的心情走上舞台。开始了，我们都演得很好，可就在我放心的时候，有一个同学竟然忘记台词了。霎那间，我急中生智，用一句“See you.”把话接到了我那边。过了几分钟后，表演完了，全场激起了雷鸣般的掌声，同时，我心里的一块大石头也放下来了。

所有人都表演完毕了，我们要分别了。虽然只有这短短的两天，但是还是让我很留恋，我在这短短的时间里认识了许多朋友；我在这短短的时间里，学会了许多的游戏；我在这短短的时间里，让我的英语水平大大提升。这难道不会令我产生留恋吗？

最后，我向老师要了电子邮件，就默默地走了。也许，这些快乐，只能在我的记忆里去寻找了。

……

戏剧英语作文 篇3

let us suppose that you are in the position of a parent. would you allow your children to read any book they wanted to without first checking its contents? would you take your children to see any film without first finding out whether it is suitable for them? if your answer to these questions is ‘yes’, then you are either extremely permissive, or just plain irresponsible. if your answer is ‘no’, then you are exercising your right as a parent to protect your children from what you consider to be undesirable influences. in other words, by acting as a censor yourself, you are admitting that there is a strong case for censorship.

now, of course, you will say that it is one thing to exercise censorship where children are concerned and quite another to do the same for adults. children need protection and it is the parents’ they old enough to decide what is good for them? the answer is that many adults are, but don’t make the mistake of thinking that all adults are like yourself. censorship is for the good of society as a whole. highly civilized people might find it possible to live amicably together without laws of any kind: they would just rely on good sense to solve their problems. but imagine what chaos there would be if we lived in a society without laws! like the law, censorship contributes to the common good.some people think that it is disgraceful that a censor should interfere with works of art. who is this person, they say, to ban this great book or cut that great film? no one can set himself up as a superior being. but we must remember two things. firstly, where genuine works of art are concerned, modern censors are extremely liberal in their views—often far more liberal than a large section of the public. artistic merit is something which censors clearly recognize. and secondly, we must bear in mind that the great proportion of books, plays and films which come before the censor are very far from being ‘works of art’.

when discussing censorship, therefore, we should not confine our attention to great masterpieces, but should consider the vast numbers of publications and films which make up the bulk of the entertainment industry. when censorship laws are relaxed, unscrupulous people are given a license to produce virtually anything in the name of ‘art’. there is an increasing tendency to equate ‘artistic’ with ‘pornographic’. the vast market for pornography would rapidly be exploited. one of the great things that censorship does is to prevent certain people from making fat profits by corrupting the minds of others. to argue in favor of absolute freedom is to argue in favor of anarchy. society would really be the poorer if it deprived itself of the wise counsel and the restraining influence which a censor provides.